+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: POLITICS (https://mockforums.net/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: Still no proof Russia had bounties on soldiers (/thread-14468.html)
Still no proof Russia had bounties on soldiers - Maggot - 09-15-2020
I have been following this. Only because the NY Times broke the story. It has been debunked as a hit piece and was a bunch of B.S. There was never a bounty and never a time when Trump disregarded it.
Just for the record.
Gen. Frank Makenzie.
RE: Still no proof Russia had bounties on soldiers - cannongal - 09-15-2020
I don't understand the whole 'bounty ' accusation. The Taliban is going to kill any country's soldiers who go against them.
On the other hand, it must be true, dutch and roo say so.
RE: Still no proof Russia had bounties on soldiers - Rootilda - 09-15-2020
Quote:"We continue to look for that evidence," the general said. "I just haven't seen it yet. But … it's not a closed issue."
You don't understand what "debunked" means, do you?
RE: Still no proof Russia had bounties on soldiers - Maggot - 09-15-2020
(09-15-2020, 09:50 PM)Rootilda Wrote:Quote:"We continue to look for that evidence," the general said. "I just haven't seen it yet. But … it's not a closed issue."
You don't understand what "debunked" means, do you?
Sure....... Debunked means some news organization once again shit on the sheet and tried to make Trump look bad. It's in Websters. Come back when you are absolutely sure of your quackery.