+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Management and Newbie Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: Introductions (https://mockforums.net/forum-9.html)
+--- Thread: nothing to see here (/thread-5047.html)
Pages:
1
2
nothing to see here - lurkmoar - 03-08-2011
Just from looking through several of the intro posts I can see there are some funny fuckers here, so why didn't you shitheads send a couple of them over to C2F? The two you sent are defective. Were you hoping they would stay the fuck away if someone thought they were cool?
Actually, I don't give a fuck. Not sure why I even asked. Might be to make a long meaningless post so that anal fucktard a few threads back won't bust my balls about 2 word posts.
RE: nothing to see here - Midwest Spy - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:02 PM)lurkmoar Wrote: Actually, I don't give a fuck. Not sure why I even asked. Might be to make a long meaningless post so that anal fucktard a few threads back won't bust my balls about 2 word posts.
Username might have her hands full with you. This should be good.
RE: nothing to see here - Lady Cop - 03-08-2011
"The two you sent are defective."
we didn't send them, they appointed themselves.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
Does it seem pathetic to anyone else that the two losers have to have a fake sponsor? How utterly sad they can't find a board to call home...
RE: nothing to see here - thekid65 - 03-08-2011
How utterly sad that anyone calls a board "home".
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
You don't have a "home" board? One that you like better than the others?
RE: nothing to see here - thekid65 - 03-08-2011
Sure I have boards that I like better than others, however, I'd never call them home. I've seen that shit, where a member returns from an absence..."Welcome home"...meh..just doesnt sound right to me.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
Some people need an internet home.
Any questions?
RE: nothing to see here - Duchess - 03-08-2011
*shudders*
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
Cities with the worst teeth:
1. St. Louis
2. Philadelphia
3. Newark
4. Baltimore
5. New Orleans
6. Jackson, Mississippi
7. Jersey City, New Jersey
8. Milwaukee
9. Kansas City
10. Dallas
RE: nothing to see here - Midwest Spy - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:52 PM)Cracker Wrote: Cities with the worst teeth:
1. St. Louis
2. Philadelphia
3. Newark
4. Baltimore
5. New Orleans
6. Jackson, Mississippi
7. Jersey City, New Jersey
8. Milwaukee
9. Kansas City
10. Dallas
Who conducted this? Looks like NJ is in pretty bad shape.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:54 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: Who conducted this? Looks like NJ is in pretty bad shape.
Men's Health magazine.
There are some funnier lists, but Men's Health is an actual source I can believe.
Although, I thought everywhere in WV would be number one...
RE: nothing to see here - sally - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:22 PM)Cracker Wrote: Does it seem pathetic to anyone else that the two losers have to have a fake sponsor? How utterly sad they can't find a board to call home...
Not only is it pathetic, but out of all the assholes that could have pretended to represent us we have to end up with fucking Bert and Tracey. Bert is moderately retarded and Tracey is a disgusting pig with misaligned tits. Go Mock Forums :B.
RE: nothing to see here - Midwest Spy - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:55 PM)Cracker Wrote:(03-08-2011, 08:54 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: Who conducted this? Looks like NJ is in pretty bad shape.
Men's Health magazine.
There are some funnier lists, but Men's Health is an actual source I can believe.
Although, I thought everywhere in WV would be number one...
Probably couldn't find a big enough qualifying city in that great state!! I'd agree with you on that one. Men's Health is a good magazine. Realistic workout plans, and I love their top 100 Hotties issue. Always nice to see where the honeys rank.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:57 PM)sally Wrote: Tracey is a disgusting pig with misaligned tits. Go Mock Forums :B.
What is up with her titties? It's like they are reversed. The West Titty should be where the East Titty is...
RE: nothing to see here - lurkmoar - 03-08-2011
I might actually start hanging out here.
So, the avatar of the disgusting muffin top with the fake tits is actually a pic of tracey? Holy fucking hell.
And hook me up. I can't even access my own shit. You know you can see more of this forum as a casual passerby than as a registered member? I feel like I'm being punked or some shit.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-08-2011
You are a newb. This is newbie hell. LC has to make you member, or you have to logout, to see the board.
You have to dazzle them (Duchess and Lady Cop) to be considered.
And don't try to pwnd us. That is just gay.
RE: nothing to see here - Fibonacci Prima - 03-08-2011
Now Cracker. Be nice. At least this one titled their thread appropriately. As if we'd assume otherwise, but the idea was there.
RE: nothing to see here - username - 03-09-2011
(03-08-2011, 08:06 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote:(03-08-2011, 08:02 PM)lurkmoar Wrote: Actually, I don't give a fuck. Not sure why I even asked. Might be to make a long meaningless post so that anal fucktard a few threads back won't bust my balls about 2 word posts.
Username might have her hands full with you. This should be good.
Jesus Christ, stop thinking about my hands fondling balls for a minute. Not going to happen.
RE: nothing to see here - Cracker - 03-09-2011
You don't like schwetty balls?