+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Serious Shit? (https://mockforums.net/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Discussions, Opinions & Debate (https://mockforums.net/forum-11.html)
+--- Thread: PRENUP ~ YEA OR NAY (/thread-5994.html)
Pages:
1
2
PRENUP ~ YEA OR NAY - Duchess - 07-07-2011
Would you be offended if you were asked to sign one? What's your personal feeling regarding them?
RE: PRENUP ~ YAY OR NAY - BlueTiki - 07-07-2011
Nope . . . not offended.
Would I do it?
Now that's something I really need to think about.
It's a 'What' and 'Why' thing.
RE: PRENUP ~ YAY OR NAY - Cracker - 07-07-2011
Shit happens. Prenups should be mandatory. I wouldn't just sign one as it was presented. I would negotiate. You don't marry people for the money, but everyone seems to have a different attitude come divorce time.
RE: PRENUP ~ YAY OR NAY - Maggot - 07-07-2011
Congratulations Duchess!!!!!
When is the big day??
RE: PRENUP ~ YAY OR NAY - Duchess - 07-07-2011
(07-07-2011, 12:46 PM)Maggot Wrote: Congratulations Duchess!!!!!
That would require a co..co..co..commitment.RE: PRENUP ~ YEA OR NAY - Midwest Spy - 07-07-2011
I believe that if a pre-nup is introduced, and the person that's being asked to sign one truly loves the 'pre-nupper', it shouldn't be a big deal to sign.
Everyone knows that relationships can go to hell quickly. Being presented with a pre-nup should not be considered offensive. "Well, you obviously don't love me..." Bullshit. It's called reality.
PRENUPS - Duchess - 02-15-2013
Would you sign one OR have one drawn up?
RE: PRENUPS - Eat Shit And Die - 02-15-2013
If I was extremely wealthy yes if she was no.
RE: PRENUPS - HairOfTheDog - 02-15-2013
(02-15-2013, 11:25 AM)ESAD Wrote: If I was extremely wealthy yes if she was no.
RE: PRENUPS - Eat Shit And Die - 02-15-2013
#shrugs#
RE: PRENUPS - Duchess - 02-15-2013
I think sometimes people forget that prenups often protect the one signing as well.
RE: PRENUPS - Eat Shit And Die - 02-15-2013
If I was rich I would have her sign if we divorce she gets shit.
RE: PRENUPS - Eat Shit And Die - 02-15-2013
Actual shit.
RE: PRENUPS - username - 02-15-2013
(02-15-2013, 12:14 PM)ESAD Wrote: Actual shit.
They're the most unromantic things in the world but unfortunately an evil necessity. It wouldn't sit well with me but I think I could get over it and participate in one (on either side).
RE: PRENUPS - Maggot - 02-15-2013
Sometimes 20% is better than nothing if you started out with nothing.
RE: PRENUPS - ramseycat - 02-15-2013
(02-15-2013, 12:13 PM)ESAD Wrote: If I was rich I would have her sign if we divorce she gets shit.
Maybe someday you will have a pot to pee in and a window to throw it out off. Till then, no need for a prenup.
RE: PRENUPS - Eat Shit And Die - 02-15-2013
Savage burn idiot but I have quite a stable amount saved up ^_^
RE: PRENUPS - Tasmanian - 02-23-2013
(02-15-2013, 11:23 AM)Duchess Wrote:
Would you sign one OR have one drawn up?
Yes. However, what a lot of people don't realize is if it signed before the couple is married duress is a valid defense to it and it can invalidate the the prenup. Also, the longer a couple us married the less likely the court is to uphold a prenup.
Many attornies will suggest to have one signed before you are married. Have it updated and signed after you are married and update it ever 7 years.
RE: PRENUPS - Maggot - 02-23-2013
It would be better at 25 yrs, a silver anniversary gift.
RE: PRENUPS - Tasmanian - 02-23-2013
Shrug....it's not romantic, but often a prenup protects both people involved. Also saves a lot in legal cost if there is a divorce. One can look at emotionally or logically. I prefer logic.