The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined property: MyLanguage::$archive_pages - Line: 2 - File: printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code PHP 8.2.27 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 153 errorHandler->error
/printthread.php(287) : eval()'d code 2 errorHandler->error_callback
/printthread.php 287 eval
/printthread.php 117 printthread_multipage



Mock
Siglines - Printable Version

+- Mock (https://mockforums.net)
+-- Forum: Personal Member Bullshit (https://mockforums.net/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: Some Honest Therapy (https://mockforums.net/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: Siglines (/thread-6158.html)

Pages: 1 2


Siglines - IMaDick - 07-29-2011

Is eliminating the siglines by chosing the option in CP the same as putting another person on ignore?

Is it the pussy way out?

Of course it is hah

Fucking liberals crack me up.


RE: Siglines - Duchess - 07-29-2011



Of course it's not like putting someone on ignore. It just means they have no interest in the drivel that others fill their sig line with. 33



RE: Siglines - Duchess - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 02:03 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Fucking liberals crack me up.


There you go again. Point out the liberals so I can brand them with a big L. Whoops, you can't do that, can you. They are a figment of your imagination.





RE: Siglines - ramseycat - 07-29-2011

I blocked them so I don't have to see them. A short funny sigline is fine. But a diseration on your opinion about something I have no interest in is not appealing to me.


RE: Siglines - aussiefriend - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 02:03 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Is eliminating the siglines by chosing the option in CP the same as putting another person on ignore?

Is it the pussy way out?

Of course it is hah

Fucking liberals crack me up.

Becktalk


RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 08:27 AM)ramseycat Wrote: I blocked them so I don't have to see them. A short funny sigline is fine. But a diseration on your opinion about something I have no interest in is not appealing to me.

I never put my opinion in my sig line.







RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-29-2011

Duchess, Username is a complete liberal in her political views.


RE: Siglines - ramseycat - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 10:50 AM)IMaDick Wrote: [quote='ramseycat' pid='178675' dateline='1311942456']
I blocked them so I don't have to see them. A short funny sigline is fine. But a diseration on your opinion about something I have no interest in is not appealing to me.

I never put my opinion in my sig line.



Well whatever it is, it's too long so I don't bother reading it. Sorry Dickie!





RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-29-2011

Ya those complete sentences are a bitch to read.


RE: Siglines - Cracker - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 12:53 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Ya those complete sentences are a bitch to read.

hah

If you block signature lines and you have a signature line, you are a douche.


RE: Siglines - Cracker - 07-29-2011

I hope mine irritates every person that bitches and thinks I'm going to change it because they bitch about it. No fucking way. Bitch to someone willing to change to appease you, not this Cracker.


RE: Siglines - username - 07-29-2011

(07-29-2011, 10:50 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Duchess, Username is a complete liberal in her political views.

This right there shows you're a political moron.

I haven't blocked sig lines yet but is it redundant to make the same statement over and over and over again? Why yes, yes it is.

Maybe I should make this my sig line so people can view your stupidity every god damn time I post.


RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-30-2011

It's been changed every day usedup, it's not the same thing over and over and over again.

Just goes to show you that you will lie like a liberal to try and devalue another persons point of view, you and harry must use the same text books.


RE: Siglines - username - 07-30-2011

(07-30-2011, 01:31 AM)IMaDick Wrote: It's been changed every day usedup, it's not the same thing over and over and over again.

That's even MORE fucked up. I read posts most days; I don't examine sig lines on a daily basis.

Jesus, you have an overactive ego--you think people actually care about your dribble much more than they do.


RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-30-2011

My dribble is this country, it's economic future and it's freedoms and rights which are secured by our constitution.

I can see why you would be offended.




RE: Siglines - username - 07-30-2011

(07-30-2011, 07:25 PM)IMaDick Wrote: My dribble is this country, it's economic future and it's freedoms and rights which are secured by our constitution.

I can see why you would be offended.

You're a fucking right wing radical turd. The fact that you're so FAR right is what splits this country apart. Most of us (normal people) fall somewhere in the middle. But then there are fanatics like you that continue to beat the right, right wing GOP drum which turns us NORMAL people off (same with those that beat the left wing drum). Normal people are independents and vote accordingly. You're a disgrace to the right and exemplify why many independents vote left when push comes to shove. You're right of Hitler. You suck.


RE: Siglines - kfran - 07-30-2011

You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you.


RE: Siglines - username - 07-30-2011

(07-30-2011, 10:33 PM)kfran Wrote: You're so vain, you probably think this post is about you.

don't you? don't you?




RE: Siglines - IMaDick - 07-30-2011

Username, placing your stereo types and liberal crap taking points on me changes nothing, when the liberal left starts calling anyone interested in freedom and the constitution extreme right, it just really points to how far left they are.

This country was designed to work within the framework of the constitution, it's people were intended to be free, any other view than that on what this country should be is the one that is fucked up beyond all reason,

fubar is what you are and extreme liberal freedom stealing control freak is what you want to be.




RE: Siglines - username - 07-30-2011

(07-30-2011, 10:45 PM)IMaDick Wrote: This country was designed to work within the framework of the constitution, it's people were intended to be free, any other view than that on what this country should be is the one that is fucked up beyond all reason,

So I take that to mean that you support gay marriage and gay people openly serving in the military, right? People are intended to be "free"?

Do you support a woman's "free choice" to have an abortion?