RETURN TO SENDER/ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

[Fry Guy]

Awesome! Well that is it for me tonight. Busy week and really tired. Just back from the pub with my daughter and one vodka on ice just about knocked me out.

[BigMark]

I have it sorted today. I got someone who is going to do some cash in hand work for me. He has done work for me before. Thanks Fry Guy.

Yeah, but what about the chairs?

[Blindgreed1]

Weird. I didn't say anything about illegals or coyotes or anyone else breaking the law.

As Fry stated it's not a "black and white" subject.

[Maggot]

Sweden allowed 600,000 Muslims into their country and were thought of as a "great society" we should be like them. Today they are burning cars in coordinated gang attacks, kids in school are getting bullied and entire neighborhoods are under immigrant control. 

Wonderfuklin full

[Maggot]

Trump sure got America to dodge a bullet with his Muslim ban. By the looks of the countries that were blind. Germany, Canada, England, France, and now Sweden.

[Fry Guy]

Trump sure got America to dodge a bullet with his Muslim ban. By the looks of the countries that were blind. Germany, Canada, England, France, and now Sweden.

Yes. I think they have moved off the cultural cliff

[Duchess]

America was built off the backs of immigrants. They are as worthy of the opportunity of working towards their version of the American dream as we all are.

[Carsman]

Many immigrants of today, are not as they were of yesteryear!

[aussiefriend]

Asylum seekers have a legitimate right to enter your country and ask for freedom. Illegal immigrants however do not. And certainly neither group have in no way done anything that credits abuse of their human rights, abuse of the system and vilification.

The job of any government, is to assess and process, if they fall into the category of illegal immigrant then you deport. However, if they are legitimate asylum seekers you do not treat them and label them as illegal immigrants. The two are completely separate.

I have done extensive research and have been published in a medical journal on this subject. Crash has read it. He is an accomplished academic.

If you chose to hate because of your uniformed educated view then that is your decision to live your life like a moron. But for God's sake, shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about.

[Blindgreed1]

You know what I just love? Mexican food.

[Maggot]

I like watermelon and fried chicken sometimes chinese food.

[Duchess]

Mmmmm fried rice.

[Fry Guy]

Asylum seekers have a legitimate right to enter your country and ask for freedom. Illegal immigrants however do not. And certainly neither group have in no way done anything that credits abuse of their human rights, abuse of the system and vilification.

The job of any government, is to assess and process, if they fall into the category of illegal immigrant then you deport. However, if they are legitimate asylum seekers you do not treat them and label them as illegal immigrants. The two are completely separate.

I have done extensive research and have been published in a medical journal on this subject. Crash has read it. He is an accomplished academic.

If you chose to hate because of your uniformed educated view then that is your decision to live your life like a moron. But for God's sake, shut the fuck up. You have no idea what you are talking about.

A country has the sovereign right to accept or reject ANYONE.

Now to put this in context, say a billion people suddenly swarmed on a country claiming asylum, the country has EVERY right simply to ignore applications and to turn them away regardless of their "rights"

They are not citizens of that country. Accepting any asylum seeker is a generous offer and a charitable and humanitarian endeavour but it is NOT a right and the country doesn't have to do a bloody thing and pretending otherwise is silly.

I do believe in multiculturalism and with assimilation. Someone going to a host country needs to want to move there and obey the laws and seek to integrate themselves into the country's culture and values. They need to accept the country they are moving to has different mores and values from that which they left.

But I think when a country is accepting and diverse, it is necessarily better. Controlled migration is good for a country.

[aussiefriend]

It's not my job to explain how to claim asylum. Clearly there are some glaring deficits there. Can't you go to the UNHCR website or do some research. Sorry I just cant.

[Fry Guy]

I KNOW how one claims asylum. None of what I said invalidates that. You know that right? The glaring deficit I believe is that you did not read nor comprehend what I said and are running with a preconception.It is in line with the "If you do not share the same political views as me then I am disappointed and can't talk to you" Comes from the same place.

[aussiefriend]

Not doing it Fry Guy. Find some other mug. When you have your findings published in a credible peer reviewed journal then maybe we can engage in meaningful dialogue. Dont start trolling me. Honestly my plate is full.

[Maggot]

[aussiefriend]

Maggot mistreating traumatizing assaulting raping hating vilifying vulnerable human beings is no laughing matter. Zero tolerance.

[Maggot]

Maggot mistreating traumatizing assaulting raping hating vilifying vulnerable human beings is no laughing matter. Zero tolerance.

Good you agree that holding people until their true identities and intentions are disseminated then. Keeping immigrants out until they can be proven not to be criminals that would traumatize, assault, rape, and prey on vulnerable legal citizens and the general commonwealth is a good idea.

[aussiefriend]

I think processing should be done in a timely manner. With those waiting approval kept in human safe consitions. You have a duty of care.

Dont worry Australia is far worse. My research was specifically examining Australia's treatment. Our detention centres are hell on Earth people have died. Like concentration camps. Shame on us.