THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY

[Fry Guy]

Trump also has some cronies at Maralago that have given him "advice" on the Veteran's Administration even though none of them have military backgrounds. People seeking lucrative government contracts also use membership to gain admittance to Trump and he makes a ton of money from membership dues.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017...632505001/

No black people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for white people
No white people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for black people
No women can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for men
No men can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for women
No disabled people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-disabled people
No non-disabled people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for disabled people
No adults can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for children
No children can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for adults
No religious can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-religious people
No non-religious people can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for religious people
No veterans can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for non-veterans
No non-veterans can hold an opinion on anything that would be beneficial for veterans

I am helping you out pointing out your logic in case any people with any critical thinking were confused about your idiocy.

[Duchess]

Yeah, that would be maddening.  The only wind farms I've seen have been isolated, which is how they should be.

These are near wine country CA.

There should be more of these as well as solar panels. That's the future, it's not fucking coal or any of the other ridiculous bullshit people talk about. Why does it have to be so goddamn difficult to get people to think about ways to be energy independent. Jesus.

[Fry Guy]

I can answer this one for you. Neither wind farms nor solar are as effective as coal-fired energy. The delivery and effectiveness is with the coal-fired. The reason the delivery systems are better has a lot to do with the fact that the default has been built into energy infrastructure for forever.

Now CAN a conversation be had to investing in less effective energy source which do not have the pre-existing infrastructure and such? Absolutely.

But it would be retarded to say that it is the future (rather it is a possibility for the future) and it is also retarded to say people are ridiculous for not holding your ideas about their importance. Isn't that correct?

[pyropappy]

BEFORE



AFTER

Quite a difference

[BigMark]

Aye carumba!

[Rootilda]

The residents of Tijuana appreciate the free gift of razor wire.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/new...story.html

[Maggot]

I remember Tijuana when it was Velvet Elvis's, cheap whores, good mescal and cheap taxis..........now look at the mess it is now.

[Rootilda]

I bought a couple of tacos from a street vendor way back in the '70s down there. I have no idea what kind of meat it was but it was delicious.

[Fry Guy]

The residents of Tijuana appreciate the free gift of razor wire.

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/new...story.html

Why do they need razor wire on their properties? I heard all the folks from around that area are very peaceful and commit crimes at much less the rate of American citizens and they are so upstanding that they do not even need to be vetted before coming into the US. In fact to do so is immoral. Did I hear right?

[BigMark]

Best fish tacos I have had was from a plywood shack in a parking spot in Tijuana, that might have been the trip where I bootie bumped a stripper off the 3' stage and her stiletto flew through the air almost hitting the bouncer in the face who then proceeded to chase me out of the bar with a billy club.

[pyropappy]

Dems lose another one

DC Circuit

[Duchess]

You read Lawfare? I'm so surprised! I thought the Conservative Tree House was more your speed.

[Duchess]

...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans.

[pyropappy]

...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans.

interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss

[Fry Guy]

...and it's funny (not funny) that you would view that as a loss for the Democrats. It should be seen as a loss for all Americans.

interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss

The same kind of ideology that thinks that it is both a shame that the President was not a Russian Asset but also even when they knew that every aspect of the origin of the special counsel and FISA applications and wiretapping and unmasking was all illegal and done solely to get Trump out "at all costs", give all those actions a free pass, BECAUSE it is Trump.

They also are unable to see every dirty trick and every case of colouring outside the lines allows their opponents to do likewise next time a similar situation presents on their side.

[MirahM]

Good thing you have it all figured out!

[Fry Guy]

Good thing you have it all figured out!

I am hardly an island. This is hardly up for grabs as an idea. It has always been a matter of WHEN are they going to act on it and WHY the wait? Hell even the Ukrainians in court for a matter that Christopher Steele (remember him) was involved in, they testified that Hillary conspired with The Ukrainians to help win the 2016 election and HAVE OFFERED to testify to this end and send sworn statements. https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/...-democrats. The Department of Justice do not seem to be interested.

The Democrats in the same situation would latch onto this like a dog with a bone. It is entirely the fault of the Republicans and the Intelligence communities.

Either they are playing a "we fight honourably and give benefit of the doubt and let sleeping dogs lie" and such OR they are just fucking useless OR they are setting the other side up and making sure every i is dotted and every t crossed. I used to be absolutely convinced of the last choice and now I think that it is equally as likely to be either of the other two.

[Duchess]

interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss

A filthy trump supporter *spits* talking about upholding the rule of law. Ahahahahahaha! Next thing you know you'll be addressing how he honors the Constitution. This is all so rich and delicious.

[Fry Guy]

interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss

A filthy trump supporter *spits* talking about upholding the rule of law. Ahahahahahaha! Next thing you know you'll be addressing how he honors the Constitution. This is all so rich and delicious.

What SPECIFICALLY in the Constitution has he NOT honoured. Not what did he do that you did not like but what specific aspects of the Constitution has he not honoured.

You can't can you? This was just a talking point that someone told you that you repeated. Conspiracy theorist much?

[HairOfTheDog]

interesting, you see upholding the rule of law as a loss

A filthy trump supporter *spits* talking about upholding the rule of law. Ahahahahahaha! Next thing you know you'll be addressing how he honors the Constitution. This is all so rich and delicious.

Yeah, fortunately Trump's unconstitutional proposals and threats have thus far been struck down by the U.S. courts, have been legally challenged prior to implementation, or have amounted to nothing more than rile-up rhetoric for the base.

For example........

His "Muslim Ban" Executive Order was struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the 'religious freedom' constitutional guarantee and reworked several times, finally passing constitutional muster as the "Travel Ban".

His threat to revoke birthright citizenship (violation of 14^th Amendment) has gone nowhere.

I think the case against President Trump alleging violations of the Constitution's emoluments clause is still pending.

Etc.