02-21-2010, 08:58 AM
(02-20-2010, 10:43 PM)SyberBitch Wrote:(02-20-2010, 03:18 PM)Middle Finger Wrote:(02-20-2010, 11:16 AM)SyberBitch Wrote:(02-19-2010, 08:26 AM)Middle Finger Wrote: What if Sally kept posting your other name on purpose, even after warned? What should happen? Now transfer that to posting links to your real personal info. On principle, should that be tolerated even though on one level it is no big deal? Anyway, there are always two sides to the story, at least.
The main difference, is that Lumpy just posted a 'link' to your information from what I understand. Posting a link to your information would not connect your 'real world' info to this forum in a forum search, unless it was the actual name of your business website in the link.
Forum search capability is not the criteria. Posting a link to personally identifying info is inappropriate and against the rules regardless of who can search or who will use it and how. Period. Keep making excuses though.
Oh suck off, Frank.
It IS relevant whether or not the post was damaging to you personally. Honestly, I wouldn't give a fuck if anyone posted all of my 'real info' in this forum, as long as it was in the 'members only' section where no one could find it with an internet search.
Forum search capability, how damaging it became, and even how much Syber gives a fuck about her own personal info is not the criteria. The criteria is posting a link to personally identifying info is inappropriate and against the rules regardless of who can search or who will use it and how. Period. Keep making excuses though.
