03-09-2011, 11:58 PM
(03-09-2011, 11:55 PM)Nina Wrote:(03-09-2011, 11:49 PM)concerned Wrote: DEFENDANT 1:
M
TOLEDO, OH 43605
Alias(es)
M
M
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COUNT PARTY DESCRIPTION ABBREV.
1 (D -1)M FAILURE TO APPEAR F4
2 (D -1)M FAILURE TO APPEAR F4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE SEQ EVENT
3/4/2011 1 Title : OPN:ORIG INDICTMENT FILED
FTA 2 CTS
PARTY : D1 - M
3/4/2011 2 Title : BND:NO BOND SET (CLERKS)
PARTY : D1 - M
3/7/2011 1 Title : WAR:WARRANT/PRINT ISS BY CLERK
PARTY : D1 - M
3/7/2011 2 Title : JRE:EXISTING PENDING CASE
CR10-2904 & CR09-3119
PARTY : -
It is public record
So what is the original indictment? Can you tell? I still think they might be holding MM and BC on other charges so they can put the pressure on them in this case. Of course it may just be that I am bull-headed and have tunnel vision but they still make sense to me.
I still stand that I will kiss the asses of everyone who has said BC is involved in some way IF he really is. I personally think he knows just as much as the rest of us, maybe a little more as hes got many connections, but still no involvement.
name edited out by LC, not related to case.