DO YOU CARE?

[BlueTiki]

Give it up.

You're babbling, scrambling and rewording.

It's rather difficult to respond to an allegation that lacks even a modicum of specificity.

Mudslinging, Tiki, or just lazy?

No.

Laymens terms.

Universal = absolute or pertaining to ALL members of a group

Existential = pertaining to at least one member of a group - BUT NOT ALL

"Liberal Moral Faggots" - is this an entire group or a subset of "X"?

If a subset of "X": name "X". ("X" being an unnamed population)

Jeezus . . . defend your statements with some reference to conventional logic terms and not with feeble retorts attempting to appear "deep".

Hell . . . classical or contemporary . . . I don't care. Just be consistent.

Or use a calculus equation and define the variables and the order of the steps.

Okay . . . I'm dishonest . . . I'm lazy.

It's your Hypothesis . . . you do the work.

"Liberal Moral Faggots" . . . still makes me chuckle.

I wish I could think of one!