06-06-2011, 02:55 PM
(06-06-2011, 12:05 PM)BlueTiki Wrote:(06-06-2011, 11:16 AM)IMaDick Wrote: and what the fuck is the having CA raise her hand and swearing to everything being true on the tape? that's some bogus bullshit, and they did it twice on the same day.
So . . . there is case law prohibiting this type of police "questioning"?
How about departmental policies?
Any cases overturned because of the "raising of hand and swearing" procedure?
"If it ain't broke . . . the appeal's a joke."
If you say so, but the courts frown on LEO's taking their place.
The written statement papers that you see the cops give out do not contain the signature of the officer, they use a legally binding sentence and the signature of the writer of the statement.
No written affidavits have been submitted into evidence, they would take priority over the tape recordings, trust me no one has to tell the police the truth.
So far the tapes prove she lied to the cops ,shocking to say the least.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
John Adams