06-29-2011, 12:44 AM
The previous post is the one I've been working on and is new. I think it might be startling to experts because of two things; more importantly is that I believe it explains most of the features at Saqqara in terms of water pressure. I don't know nough about this site to have great confidence. Secondly is that the measurement of the Giza second pyramid enclosure wall is exactly 770 cubits. While this could be mere coincidence it does strongly support my contention. The pyramids are considered a sort of boat by the builders and even the work crews were named after parts of boats.
In a later work there is mention of a "sandbank of 440 cubits bringing water and of horrible face". This is consistent with water in the walls of the horizontal passage at 80' in G1 whose dimensions are 440 cubits by 440 cubits.
I got your horrible face right here;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fly_geyser.jpg
I'm just sitting on the post for right now and posted it on only one Egypt site. I just want to see if it attracts attention.
I don't know about "tau". I think pi are squared but two pi be better. I used to be good at math but no more. It took an hour just to calculate the amount of water needed and to determine that they needed a bigger lake than the courtyard or auxilliary power.
In a later work there is mention of a "sandbank of 440 cubits bringing water and of horrible face". This is consistent with water in the walls of the horizontal passage at 80' in G1 whose dimensions are 440 cubits by 440 cubits.
I got your horrible face right here;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fly_geyser.jpg
I'm just sitting on the post for right now and posted it on only one Egypt site. I just want to see if it attracts attention.
I don't know about "tau". I think pi are squared but two pi be better. I used to be good at math but no more. It took an hour just to calculate the amount of water needed and to determine that they needed a bigger lake than the courtyard or auxilliary power.