Caylee Anthony. NO JUSTICE

[BlueTiki]

The judge is definitely baez againt baez!

If the defense submitted just "one" page of new discovery this morning to the state, the state would have been crying ambush! However, the state just submitted "232" pages of new disclosure (info they knew from Cindy's deposition two years ago) to the defense this morning, and the defense cryed ambush, but judge did not rule that as ambush. If that's not ambush, what is? Double standard!

Cindy's timecard states she was at work during the time period the computer searches were performed.

Cindy states, ON THE STAND, she performed the computer searches.

Cindy states, ON THE STAND, she performed these searches AT HOME.

Baez claims she's a salaried employee, therefore timecards are meaningless and do not represent her "true" time at work.

My question to you and Baez: "If timecards are meaningless to account for the hours of a salaried employee, why use them?"

Or - "What document or witness can place Cindy at the house and performing the computer searches when her timecard clearly states she was at work?"

I never did hear any evidence to support the defense's position that Caylee drowned.

I never did hear any evidence that placed Casey, Caylee and George in the house, day Caylee allegedly drowned.

And Casey appears not to be willing to tell the jurors of the "horrors" she allegedly suffered, by the hands of her father and brother.

Bummer.

But at least she won't feel the need to lie about her employment for the next few years.

Unless she thinks she's a Trustee.