09-30-2011, 10:17 PM
As I understand it (without researching it), George Bush originally signed an arrest or kill order for him and Obama reaffirmed it. If Ron Paul were President, you have to assume that he wouldn't have signed the same order and therefore, this guy would still be alive.
I think the other slippery slope is you open all of this up to debate and discussion and nothing gets done with regards to pursuing terrorists. Not to mention the risk of leaks etc.
Maggot, where exactly does Ron Paul think we should be? Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya? or now Yemen? Does he disagree with pursuing al-qaida entirely? I might be wrong but if I understand his position, we shouldn't be involved in conflicts (or pursuing al-qaida) anywhere. He's kind of isolationist in that regard. Too much so in my opinion.
I think the other slippery slope is you open all of this up to debate and discussion and nothing gets done with regards to pursuing terrorists. Not to mention the risk of leaks etc.
Maggot, where exactly does Ron Paul think we should be? Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya? or now Yemen? Does he disagree with pursuing al-qaida entirely? I might be wrong but if I understand his position, we shouldn't be involved in conflicts (or pursuing al-qaida) anywhere. He's kind of isolationist in that regard. Too much so in my opinion.
Commando Cunt Queen