10-12-2011, 05:58 PM
Deliberations over for today. Read that the jury asked for clarification of instructions and whether they had to distinguish between guilt as principle and accessory.
God-damned defense attorneys about the what-if scenarios - yeah, shift the blame to the victims and LE.
What if when your shit-head client was in the grocery store, he just paid for his groceries and went home (instead of following the Petits)?
What if when your SHC was driving to the Petits, he decided it was a bad idea, and turned the car around?
What if when Hayes was out at the bank with Mrs. Petit, your SHC left the house and made an anonymous 911 call?
The what-ifs can go on ad nauseum. But there were two people there who controlled the situation. There were hundreds of decision points were Komisarjevsky could have turned the situation around.
God-damned defense attorneys about the what-if scenarios - yeah, shift the blame to the victims and LE.
What if when your shit-head client was in the grocery store, he just paid for his groceries and went home (instead of following the Petits)?
What if when your SHC was driving to the Petits, he decided it was a bad idea, and turned the car around?
What if when Hayes was out at the bank with Mrs. Petit, your SHC left the house and made an anonymous 911 call?
The what-ifs can go on ad nauseum. But there were two people there who controlled the situation. There were hundreds of decision points were Komisarjevsky could have turned the situation around.