10-30-2011, 06:40 AM
The high courts, yes they would allow it or could allow it.
at least the way the court is now it could happen.
The problem in bills like this is that they are passed under the guise of protection from the loss of revenue for a certian group of people, it is put forth as a way to curb copyright infringement but the collateral damage to others is disregarded and thus the country becomes less free.
bills like this which seem innocuous on the surface and seem to protect intellectual property from being used without compensation in fact takes a little bit of the first amendment and trashes it, everyone loses freedom.
at least the way the court is now it could happen.
The problem in bills like this is that they are passed under the guise of protection from the loss of revenue for a certian group of people, it is put forth as a way to curb copyright infringement but the collateral damage to others is disregarded and thus the country becomes less free.
bills like this which seem innocuous on the surface and seem to protect intellectual property from being used without compensation in fact takes a little bit of the first amendment and trashes it, everyone loses freedom.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
John Adams