Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SHHHHHH
#14
(01-17-2012, 02:30 PM)sally Wrote:
(01-17-2012, 01:19 PM)IMaDick Wrote: The hot button word is euthanasia, yet none can explain how that will diminish based on a spay neuter ordinance.

Spaying and neutering stops the overpopulation of unwanted animals, you dumb sonofabitch. How much more of an explanation do you need? It's an ordinance because people can't be trusted to be responsible pet owners.

It will stop nothing but your dollars with the county.

Perhaps you think making an ordinance suddenly makes everyone responsible?

Hows that working out for drunk driving,speeding,dog licenses,barking dogs or any other ordinance you wish to name, the whole point is ordinaces stop nothing, all they do is become income generators for the county,state or federal governments.

This one will cause the animals to suffer even more.



Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
















Reply


Messages In This Thread
SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 12:16 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 12:20 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 12:29 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by sally - 01-17-2012, 12:58 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 12:59 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 12:31 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 01:05 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 01:19 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by sally - 01-17-2012, 02:30 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 02:43 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by sally - 01-17-2012, 02:53 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 03:18 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Adub - 01-17-2012, 11:26 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 01:24 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by IMaDick - 01-17-2012, 01:36 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 01:39 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Duchess - 01-17-2012, 02:31 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Cracker - 01-17-2012, 05:58 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by krystalshores - 01-17-2012, 06:27 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by thekid65 - 01-17-2012, 06:36 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by sally - 01-17-2012, 06:38 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Cracker - 01-17-2012, 11:14 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by FAHQTOO - 01-17-2012, 11:50 PM
RE: SHHHHHH - by username - 01-18-2012, 01:10 AM
RE: SHHHHHH - by Cracker - 01-18-2012, 01:40 AM