03-26-2012, 01:43 PM
(03-26-2012, 01:17 PM)Nina Wrote:(03-26-2012, 10:07 AM)Duchess Wrote:(03-26-2012, 09:16 AM)Nina Wrote: What legal boundary are you certain that he crossed?
Hmmm, let's see...he murdered a kid armed with skittles & iced tea.
What FACTS are you basing this on? Not speculation, not opinion, not gut feeling or emotion - what facts? We have no facts or hard evidence to support that claim.
Anyone who claims they don't judge others (good or bad) based on their personal life experiences and emotions is full of shit. It is human nature. People are ASSUMING that Zimmerman judged this kid because he was black and refusing to consider the possibility that Trayvon really was up to no good. Do 17 year olds commit burglaries, assaults, car jackings? Every day. Do middle age cop want to bes get on power trips? Sure they do. But we have no EVIDENCE that either of these things happened and there is literally a bounty on this man's head.
Fact 1, the kid was unarmed, except for skittles and iced tea
Fact 2, the kid had every right to be where he was and was commiting no crimes
Fact 3, Zimmerman had a problem with that and called in
Fact 4, He was told not to persue
Fact 5, he did in fact persue
Fact 6, he got out of his vehicle and there was come kind of confrontation wherin Zimmerman recieved injuries
Fact 7, He then shot the kid
Fact 8, If he had remained in his vehicle this would not have happened
Fact 9, If he had done what he was told to do it would not have happened
Fact 10, if you kill someone intentionally or accidentially while doing something stupid or illegal anywhere in this country you held responsible for that death and will be charged with anything from Negligent Homicide, Criminally Negligent Homicide, Manslaughter, 2nd Degree Murder, the list goes on.
This jackwagon is guilty. The only reason any of it happened at all was that Zimmerman was suffering from testosterone poisoning and either fear or hatred for blacks.