Cracker...front and center!!!

[HairOfTheDog]

"all-knowing one"? Why is that an insult? You can attack me all you want, Cracker doesn't care, but it doesn't change the fact that an armed person probably wouldn't choose close contact. Why would Z attack him? You tell me. (You might have already told me, didn't want to read all that. haha)

I do blame the parents. That kid should have been in a different town on that night getting ready for school. And he should have at least been grounded if he was suspended from school. You disagree?

You should be the last one to make jokes about lengths of posts. It's a weak mock anyway.

You called me "smart one", so I called you "all-knowing". Meh. Seriously, you're all over the map here, Cracker.

I don't believe that you have any insight into this famiily dynamic. Trayvon being with his father at his father's fiancee's house because he was suspended from school is not a sign of bad parenting, to me. Trayvon being allowed to walk to the store for a snack while he was on suspension is not a sign of bad parenting, to me. I respect your opinion to the contrary. Neither matters. Bad parenting didn't kill Trayvon; George Zimmerman did. That's undisputed. It's the circumstances surrounding why Zimmerman killed Trayvon that are under investigation.

Btw: You argued the exact opposite point in the Whitney Houston thread. For length's sake, I won't repost your comments, but you were adament that parents shouldn't be held responsible for what their teen children do; the child should know better. So, why are you holding Trayvon's parent's responsible? If you had been shot while you were doing all that awesome cocaine when you were 18 years old, would you have supported your good, conservative parents being held responsible for your shooting instead of your shooter? By your logic in this case, the answer is "yes".