05-10-2012, 03:50 PM
(05-10-2012, 02:27 PM)Duchess Wrote:(05-10-2012, 02:21 PM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote: It wasn't about sexual relations, it was about equal rights for all people under the law.
I'm hung up on what is fair. That's very important to me & plays a role in many things not just this particular circumstance.
The civil union law was birthed in the concept of fairness and equal protection under the law, not defined by whether or not the relationship was sexual.
It was SPECIFIC in this circumstance and is a template for this function. You can be gay and share a debt, but can't get married?
It's bullshit. A contract between two people is a contract. The state has no right to discern the morality thereof.