05-13-2012, 03:00 AM
Quote:There are somethings I don't feel compelled to compromise on.
Were not talking about pink slime here.
Explain for us how the actions of persons who don't concern you, don't cost you money, and don't in any way infringe on your right to be or not be married to a woman is an issue you need to take a hardline stance on.
Exactly what part of homosexuality troubles you so much? Is it the love of show tunes? The impeccable personal grooming? The heightened interest in fashion and interior design? In order to claim some sort of "moral compromise" is being forced on you, you first need to define exactly what you find immoral in homosexuality.
We all know it's the sex part that titillates and horrifies you, Dickie.
In that case, here are two things you need to consider:
1. All humans in utero start their existence as sexless, with female as the default. Even you. Sure there are genetic changes (caused by a single chromosome) later on in gestation that create penis and testes in some embryos, but that doesn't occur until the THIRD month, and as many of you pro-lifers will happily point out, life begins at conception.
This means, Dick, that for the first three months you existed you were a lesbian. Dick the Dyke.
2. If the sex part is the only part of homosexuality that bothers you, and you take a hardline stance against gay rights because you don't want someone else's morality shoved down your throat like a throbbing kielbasa...isn't that exactly what you're doing to them?