06-02-2012, 11:04 AM
(06-02-2012, 12:34 AM)cladking Wrote: This thread could go bad but I'm hoping to discuss this and gain insight.
This line made me smile, Clad. It's a good topic, imo.
Here's my take.
Most people can aggressively make their points, debate heatedly, mock, and move on; respecting that they’re typically not going to change another’s mind when it comes to matters of religion, race, sexuality, politics, morality, etc… The majority really values the diversity of viewpoints, in my experience.
Then, there’s what I mentally refer to as the “spattin’ naggers”. Always in a spat with someone. Peripherally offending/annoying those not targeted is a bonus. When they’re not spattin’, they’re naggin’ someone over real or perceived slights or differences of opinion (or attempting to create friction). In topical debate/discussion, spattin’ naggers aren’t as interested in the politically correct cause/point that they’re feverishly trying to push; it’s more about trying to convince themselves and others that they’ve defeated someone else, even when there is no victory possible because opinion/judgment is subjective.
While some may find spattin’ naggers offensive, freedom of expression trumps all and they sometimes serve a purpose. There's a place for them in the internet ecosystem, in my opinion.
Have you hugged a spattin' nagger today?