06-13-2012, 05:44 AM
From a legal perspective, the evidence that was presented at the trial that was used to convict her was proven to be false. The scientific evidence was just plain wrong. That alone proves that she should not have been convicted, based on these events. The fact is, dingoes are predatory pack animals. There have been more and more reported attacks and even fatalities. Tonight on the local news here, there was a report of a dingo tearing into a tent to try and get at the children. I think she is innocent and I think it was a terrible thing that she and her family paid such an awful price. They felt the full brunt of peoples hatred. People can be really horrible and evil, that's true. I don't think it applies in this case. I am glad for her that she has been vindicated.