06-15-2012, 12:15 PM
(06-15-2012, 12:02 PM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote:(06-15-2012, 10:59 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: It couldn't be error-free unless human psychology changed. People can be easily influenced by others, by their own thought processes and defensive mechanisms, etc... The device could at best be 100% accurate at measuring whether someone believed they were telling the truth, not whether their perceived truth is reality.
If the male version had a cock sleeve attached to an electrode I bet it would be error free.
What?
How so?