Ramsey Appreciation Thread

[Donovan]

@ Sally I object on the grounds that Donovan's relative dickheadedness is a pre-existing condition and therefore outside the statute of limitations herein. Further, since the legal question being raised is whether or not sally-ho was victimized at a tender age by being plied with free booze, the question of her character is the only relevant one.

Seems to me the question of character is irrelevant. Asked and answered.

Agreed. Quid Pro Quo would mean that we can stipulate that it be acknowledged that I am in fact a dickhead if it can also be admitted into evidence that sally is a boozehound tart with a dysfunctional history. However, since she has not yet clarified the discrepancy of her statements, to wit: 1) IF she received many, many free drinks for looking "Pleasant", and 2) IF she married right from high school, and 3)IF she has remained faithful for 20+years... Where did the occasion occur that she received all these free drinks, when did she find it necessary to rely on her pleasant looks to receive said drinks, WHO was the the provider or providers of said drinks, HOW old was she at the time of these drink exchanges, and WHAT did she offer in exchange for said drinks aside from a chance to gaze upon her pleasant looks?

These questions remain pertinent in the case at hand because Sally has in fact called me a liar, and I have submitted clear evidence that she is the one hiding the truth.


I believe I am justified in demanding answers or an immediate retraction of said statement, and let it also be noted that sally is a potty mouth which speaks further to her lower tier upbringing.