09-11-2012, 03:55 PM
(09-11-2012, 03:38 PM)Duchess Wrote:
Ily, everyone who has ever entered Mock has known I don't want LC fucked with. I don't think it would take an engineer to recognize that anyway and most people don't even have to be told. I pretty much give people a free reign in here & then there are those who want to push, that's where the caveat comes in to play, I reserve the right to sacrifice a Member in order to have a smooth running site.
Well, I entered Mock and I didn't know until now. Same applies for user, apparently. Maybe some things should be said very clearly and somewhere where everyone reads it - like in the rules, for example. As for the rest - meh. You and I obviously have different views on what constitutes a "smooth running board", as one person telling another one that she is "dumb" would not exactly make my list of things threatening it. Since I am not the one in power at Mock, I leave it at that and add an imo.
(09-11-2012, 03:39 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: i'm not off-limits to mocking, Duchess is protective of me as i am of her. some mocking is fun for everyone.
but that wasn't mocking. that was simply a baseless nasty attack, for what reason i have no idea.
Well, obviously, you are, Duchess says so. And as to a "baseless nasty attack" vs. mocking - I've read through a variety of old threads these past days, and you know what I find peculiar? There are people telling other ppl that they want to kill them, or wish death upon them, or call them sluts, mongs, you name the insult, it's there. Some of those who did these posts are respected members in here. Some, like cracker, are gone by their own volition and people are saying they want them to come back. So, what exactly makes a person's DIAF a mock, and Gear's "Fuck LC" a nasty attack worth banning?
(Rhetorical question. I am too old to seriously try and fight bans anymore, no matter how much I loathe them. Just consider this my 2 cents to your comment.)
Oh, as for Gear "trolling" LC - that is not trolling.