11-03-2012, 06:28 PM
To be overshadowed by a dead serial killing relative; that could yield an appeal in this case. Especially, if there is adquate proof that the story itself may have impeded a fair and impartial hearing. I think anyone would be creeped out by knowing that information about anyone to begin with.
Is it possible that Kasper is innocent and his guilt was "GACY" provoked or spurred by the anger of a child over being disciplined??
I find it incredibly compelling when the state or defense bring in medical evidence. Which in this case; appears to have happened.
The victim, 12 at the time (now 13) has recanted her story??? Could that bring doubt to the case or any evidence for that matter?
I think I would be leaning on reasonable doubt in this case as a Juror, but I am curious as to specific evidence. Which "SHOCKER" (no pun intended) the media has not really given specifics!