Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RIGHT TO BARE ALL
#1
I don't mind naked people, anywhere, really - no matter what they look like. But, I think these protestors are showing their assess, in more ways than one.

You can strip down for certain parades, fairs, etc... in SF. There's a nude beach close by and nudist colonies not far from the city. You can hang out with your friends naked as can be at your private residence and no one can stop you... While not being able to walk around naked on public streets and in businesses is a violation of freedom of expression to some degree (I actually agree with the protestors on that), the ordinance against it is a reasonable one for safety and societal purposes and these protestors should just let it go already.

Here's the story:
(CNN) -- San Francisco residents who like to relax around town naked will have to keep their pants on.

The city's Board of Supervisors approved a public nudity ban Tuesday in a 6-5 vote.

As soon as the measure passed, some protesters inside City Hall tore off their clothes. Authorities draped them in blue blankets and led them away.

Supervisor Scott Wiener, who introduced the ordinance, disputed claims that the measure violates freedom of expression.

"We're a city that believes in freedom, and we've always believed in freedom and free expression," Wiener told CNN affilite KGO. "But taking your pants off at Castro and Market and displaying your genitals to everyone, that's not free expression."

But some nudists have filed a lawsuit claiming the ban violates their First Amendment rights.

"Is the First Amendment more powerful and more important than the passions of an intolerant mob and the ambitions of one or more city supervisors? We would contend that it is, and that's what our case is based upon," the nudists' attorney, Christina DiEdoardo, told KGO.

The ban does not apply at "permitted parades, fairs and festivals."

Otherwise, those caught naked in public could face fines of $100 to $500, depending on the number of prior offenses. A person who violates the ordinance three times in a year could also face one year in jail.


http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/21/us/califor...hpt=us_mid
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by HairOfTheDog - 11-23-2012, 11:27 AM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Duchess - 11-23-2012, 11:54 AM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by ramseycat - 11-23-2012, 12:21 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Sphincter Cop - 11-23-2012, 12:37 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by HairOfTheDog - 11-24-2012, 12:02 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by username - 11-24-2012, 12:26 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Maggot - 11-24-2012, 12:47 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by HairOfTheDog - 11-24-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Duchess - 11-24-2012, 01:47 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Sphincter Cop - 11-24-2012, 04:11 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Maggot - 11-24-2012, 09:07 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by HairOfTheDog - 11-25-2012, 02:39 AM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by HairOfTheDog - 01-18-2013, 08:51 PM
RE: RIGHT TO BARE ALL - by Maggot - 01-18-2013, 09:08 PM