03-05-2013, 12:45 PM
There are two parts to that question. Should the genetic parents have the right to make the decision? Secondly, knowing her medical condition now, was it right to give birth to her with her very uncertain future and, I hate to say it, the medical costs?
Thoughts?
A woman paid $22,000 to have a Connecticut couple's baby fled across the country and had the child after refusing their instructions to abort it when ultrasound scans revealed a series of disabilities.
Five months into the pregnancy last year, surrogate mother Crystal Kelley was told the bad news by doctors - beginning a tragic and heartbreaking ordeal for her and the baby's parents.
Following a legal battle with the parents, Crystal, 29, flew to Michigan to give birth, leaving the child to be fostered, instead of being raised by either herself or the intended parents.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2MgV6z3nM
Thoughts?
A woman paid $22,000 to have a Connecticut couple's baby fled across the country and had the child after refusing their instructions to abort it when ultrasound scans revealed a series of disabilities.
Five months into the pregnancy last year, surrogate mother Crystal Kelley was told the bad news by doctors - beginning a tragic and heartbreaking ordeal for her and the baby's parents.
Following a legal battle with the parents, Crystal, 29, flew to Michigan to give birth, leaving the child to be fostered, instead of being raised by either herself or the intended parents.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2MgV6z3nM
Commando Cunt Queen