03-05-2013, 02:25 PM
(03-05-2013, 02:19 PM)username Wrote: ...at the minimum I think the bio parents have a case for breech of contract.
I agree. But, I don't think the genetic parents would have much luck getting the $22k back even if they thought it was worth (emotionally and financially) pursuing it legally. Sad situation for them all the way around.
I now get why you asked, "huh?". I don't know why I added "genetic" to this statement I posted upthread:
"I should have just used "birth" or "surrogate" or "genetic" mom when referring to Crystal."
I will steal from Jodi Arias and just say that my brain is scrambled and a fog has set in.
