Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should this child have been born?
#11
(03-05-2013, 02:02 PM)username Wrote: IMO she violated the contract she had with the parents. There was a clause in there about them having the right to require a pregnancy termination in the event of significant genetic problems.

By fostering the child, the contracting parents essentially experienced the same outcome as a pregnancy termination . . . NO KID UNDER THEIR ROOF.

What were the other terms of the contract?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Should this child have been born? - by username - 03-05-2013, 12:45 PM
RE: Should this child have been born? - by BlueTiki - 03-05-2013, 02:41 PM
RE: Should this child have been born? - by sally - 03-05-2013, 04:59 PM
RE: Should this child have been born? - by sally - 03-05-2013, 05:24 PM