Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should this child have been born?
#46
(03-05-2013, 05:08 PM)username Wrote:
(03-05-2013, 04:59 PM)sally Wrote: I personally would abort a baby that had heteropaxy and holoprosencephaly since babies with that condition are usually vegetables, that is if they don't die shortly after birth. But she was born and she is thriving and for both the bio and surrogate to ditch the poor baby is disgusting. I think they're all scumbags.


Agreed. Scumbags. But I'm not sure about the thriving part. She's still at risk of dying and there's only a 50% chance she'll ever walk or talk.

Apparently they all visit her. As I said earlier, I have a huge amount of respect for the people that adopted her. They're the heroes in this.


Yeah I already edited thriving out after I thought about it for a second. She doesn't look like she has a severe holoprosencephaly, so I hope she does well. If you have ever seen pictures of babies born with holoprosencephaly it could be much much worse.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Should this child have been born? - by username - 03-05-2013, 12:45 PM
RE: Should this child have been born? - by sally - 03-05-2013, 04:59 PM
RE: Should this child have been born? - by sally - 03-05-2013, 05:24 PM