05-24-2013, 12:22 PM
Was Z, as acting neighborhood watch personnel, in the right for following a stranger that is wandering around on a rainy night in his gated community? That is debatable.
Was T in the right for attacking a person for simply following him around in a unfamiliar community? That is also debatable.
Was Z in the right for shooting someone who was taller, younger and in better shape then he was, when he was attacked and being assaulted by that stranger? That is also debatable.
We can all sit here and armchair quarterback this thing to death, but none of us really know what we would have done had we ben in either of their shoes.
Myself, should I have ben in Z's shoes and that person attack me like T did, I am not sure that I would not have shot him myself, but I was not there and I do not know the real story, but we all know there are 3 sides to every story. My side, your side and the truth and I am afraid that we will never hear the real truth about this story.
Was T in the right for attacking a person for simply following him around in a unfamiliar community? That is also debatable.
Was Z in the right for shooting someone who was taller, younger and in better shape then he was, when he was attacked and being assaulted by that stranger? That is also debatable.
We can all sit here and armchair quarterback this thing to death, but none of us really know what we would have done had we ben in either of their shoes.
Myself, should I have ben in Z's shoes and that person attack me like T did, I am not sure that I would not have shot him myself, but I was not there and I do not know the real story, but we all know there are 3 sides to every story. My side, your side and the truth and I am afraid that we will never hear the real truth about this story.