06-04-2013, 10:44 AM
(06-04-2013, 10:30 AM)Midwest Spy Wrote:(06-04-2013, 10:24 AM)sally Wrote:(06-04-2013, 10:09 AM)Midwest Spy Wrote: What a nice, fresh approach.
Yes indeed, very nice and fresh. The complete opposite of you saying that T was a thug who deserved it and making up your own ridiculous accounts of what happened that night.
I still stand by my original statement that T attacked him without provocation.
And I still think that Trayvon Martin was on his way to a life of crime.
Sue me.
No, your original statement was that Z was jumped or bumrushed by T, against what George himself said.
When that was pointed out to you again, your new original statement became "sucker punched".
Stringing up Zimmerman based on opinions about what's been presented, or blaming the dead kid because you could foresee him becoming a criminal had he lived. Nobody's getting sued for either position.
At least you know better than to claim yourself a voice of reason.