walking while black - Trayvon Martin

[Midwest Spy]

That will be what the jury is asked to decide. Did T have the right to attack Z (and all we have is Z's version of the story)?

No the most important thing the jury will have to decide is IF the defence can convince the jury that T attacked Z did Z have the right to shoot and kill him in response?

Deciding whether a teenager had the right to break the nose of a guy who was following him is a far less important a question than deciding whether a grown man had the right to shoot and kill an unarmed teenager.

Doesn't work that way.

You're right, however, it's all intertwined.