06-05-2013, 11:17 AM
Something about the statement written in page 2 of 2, about 1⁄2 way through the report has me scratching my head.
Read,
Office of medical examiner, district 7 & 24
Medical examiner case report.
Page 2 of 2
It says, the 911 dispatchers received a call from a resident of the complex. The resident advised of a BM who was at the complex between the townhouses.The caller said the BM should not have ben in the area and he observed the BM while WALKING his neighborhood watch .Shortly after the call THE RESIDENT CONFRONTED the male and the two began to fight. Witnesses observed the two fighting in the yard and then the resident fired a handgun at the male striking him in the chest. The male fell to the ground and police arrived at the scene.
My problems here are that they said Z was walking and not driving.
They say that the resident [Z] confronted the BM {T}.
Are those just mistakes by the ME, or are they mistakes on Z's part?
I also have a question about one other area in this report. page 3 of 6 , Medical examiners report, report of autopsy . Evidence of injury.
On that page it states the location and size of the bullet hole, but it says it is consistent with a wound of entrance of INTERMEDIATE RANGE.
I have a problem with that because a wound from a up close and personal gunshot, like that of one caused while the person was on top of you, bent over and bashing your head in the ground would not be intermediate range, I would think that to be CLOSE range.
That's just a couple of my observations after my first reading of the report.
Read,
Office of medical examiner, district 7 & 24
Medical examiner case report.
Page 2 of 2
It says, the 911 dispatchers received a call from a resident of the complex. The resident advised of a BM who was at the complex between the townhouses.The caller said the BM should not have ben in the area and he observed the BM while WALKING his neighborhood watch .Shortly after the call THE RESIDENT CONFRONTED the male and the two began to fight. Witnesses observed the two fighting in the yard and then the resident fired a handgun at the male striking him in the chest. The male fell to the ground and police arrived at the scene.
My problems here are that they said Z was walking and not driving.
They say that the resident [Z] confronted the BM {T}.
Are those just mistakes by the ME, or are they mistakes on Z's part?
I also have a question about one other area in this report. page 3 of 6 , Medical examiners report, report of autopsy . Evidence of injury.
On that page it states the location and size of the bullet hole, but it says it is consistent with a wound of entrance of INTERMEDIATE RANGE.
I have a problem with that because a wound from a up close and personal gunshot, like that of one caused while the person was on top of you, bent over and bashing your head in the ground would not be intermediate range, I would think that to be CLOSE range.
That's just a couple of my observations after my first reading of the report.