06-06-2013, 09:54 PM
(06-06-2013, 09:04 PM)Adub Wrote: How about keeping in mind that George's father had to listen to it a second time to recognize George's voice.
And please give Tracy Martin a friggin break, he heard the tape only days after his son was killed.
Keeping it all in mind, Adub.
It isn't a stellar quality audio tape.
I mentioned Trayvon's dad because he was the closest thing to a voice for Trayvon himself. Objectively, George said the voice didn't sound like his own and Tracy couldn't originally identify the voice as Trayvon's.
Those are the facts. There's nothing disparaging towards Tracy Martin involved in that statement.
Keep in mind, I've said for a long while that I disagree with the legal pundits who believe that the screams on the 911 tape are the pivotal evidence in this case. I think it will be the forensics and how they match up (or don't match up) to Zimmerman's version of events. That and George's believability in his statements and in his testimony, should he take the stand.
Assuming they're allowed to testify: unless the voice recognition experts are very confident and convincing about who they hear and what they hear, and each side's experts don't simply cancel each other out, my opinion on that will remain the same.