06-24-2013, 06:29 PM
(06-24-2013, 06:18 PM)Duchess Wrote:(06-24-2013, 05:55 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Usually, a prior bad act entails a crime committed by the defendant in the past, accusation of incriminating or illegal behavior in the past, or something to that effect (based on cases that I've followed). In this case, O'Mara is using previous calls to 911 where George identified black males as suspicious as "prior bad acts". Never seen it used in such a way.
Thank you very much. I just didn't get why his own attorney would be referencing something his client did as a "bad act".
Because the Judge is good. And she is not allowing the attorneys to make speaking objections. If an attorney objects, they have to state the grounds for the objection and STFU!
I guess this is the best that the defense could come up with when put on the spot. The defense fucked-up. And tried to squirm out of it. I think. I will have to go back and listen.