06-24-2013, 07:20 PM
(06-24-2013, 07:15 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: ^ I corrected that mistake before you replied, Zero. Sorry for the confusion.To clarify then. It is the prosecution that wants the calls included but the defense wants them excluded on the grounds that they are more inflammatory then probative in scope.
But who is declaring them 'past bad acts'? If the defense is making that declaration isn't that a damaging character reference.