06-28-2013, 05:08 PM
(06-28-2013, 04:50 PM)BlueTiki Wrote:(06-28-2013, 01:43 PM)username Wrote: I'm not sure the jury will get past reasonable doubt and fault George sufficiently for pursuing Trayvon.
Was Shootin' Zim EVER charged with unlawful pursuit or some such nonsense?
Big deal he followed a nigger kid in his housing area . . . is that illegal?
Prove to me he pursued with intent to kill and I'll maybe shed a tear for his grieving parents and their racist supporters.
Prove to me Trayvon didn't throw the first punch or get all up in his face and I'll concede Zim was coon hunting.
In fact, prove that Trayvon was provoked.
That's just it; the prosecution isn't proving their case. Prove to me that George didn't grab Trayvon by the arm or otherwise initiate contact.
Huh?? Huh?? You like them apples??
I still say Trayvon had every right to stand his ground. If I had some creepy ass cracker following me around without identifying himself and being all sneaky and stuff, I'd punch him too. Hell, maybe he flashed his gun at Trayvon and T freaked thinking the guy was going to shoot him. The whole fight might have been a wrestle for the gun.
I wish the dead could talk.
Commando Cunt Queen