06-30-2013, 03:49 PM
(06-30-2013, 02:19 PM)Adub Wrote: The look on O'Mara's face was priceless. So the mounted position, according to Good, only happened on the sidewalk, after GZ was doing the slip and slide, squirm, shimmy off the grass? George squirmed his fat ass toward the sidewalk? And was helpless to shove the savage known as Trayvon from on top of him?
The back of George's pants should show some evidence of grass stains if he was being brutally held down in the wet grass as he frantically squirmed toward the safety of the sidewalk. Wouldn't you think?
These are the kinds of points that I'm hoping to see the prosecution address next week. I want to hear from qualified forensics/LE witnesses regarding the prosecution's theory in these areas:
-What the stains (or lack thereof) on both parties' clothes signify.
-The implications of the "contact" gunshot wound.
-The implications of the location of the gunshot in Travyon's body as compared to the location of the hole in his sweatshirt.
-The implications of neither Trayvon's nor George's hands showing any indication of having "rained down blows" or having defended oneself from such blows.
-How the time line of the incident (and location/distance) refutes Zimmerman's account.
-George's state of mind - evidence to support that he profiled Trayvon and intentionally killed him, or at least that his actions don't legally meet the qualifications for self-defense.
Hoping to see all of this strung together in a cohesive way to tell the prosecution's story of what happened before the defense's case begins.
So far, there's no prosecution narrative to support the charges and claims made in opening statements, imo. I expected that though. The neighbors all perceived things differently, but had to be called. Time to move on to facts and theory based on facts.