07-02-2013, 11:43 AM
(07-02-2013, 11:28 AM)BlueTiki Wrote:(07-02-2013, 11:16 AM)username Wrote: . . . but the following is what they should be pounding home with the jurors to argue against Z's self defense claim (he "chased" him, he didn't identify himself, etc).
It's been hot here, so maybe I'm confused . . .
1.) You can't chase unless someone is running.
2.) "He didn't identify himself." So what? If he did, was Trayvon obligated to immediately stop running and become compliant?
Skittles ran, turned (when he thought he had an advantage), put his game face on and got all up in the Zim's mug.
Skittles didn't think tubbie had a gun and went crazy nigger on his fat ass.
Now 'splain them self defense rules to me again?
1. Trayvon running seems to indicate he was trying to get away from the creepy ass cracker and G was the aggressor.
2. If Z had identified himself instead of trying to catch Trayvon doing something wrong (my opinion) I believe the whole fight could have been avoided.
3. Skittle's getting up in Z's face initially is an assumption and goes to those crucial few moments that nobody witnessed. I still believe Z could have laid a hand on T's shoulder or spotted T and flashed his weapon. I don't think Z was just strolling back to his truck since he told NE911 to have police call him instead of agreeing to just meet them there.
Commando Cunt Queen