07-11-2013, 09:06 PM
(07-11-2013, 08:49 PM)Jimbone Wrote: HotD, my entire post was referring to the attempted 3rd degree inclusion that was sprung at the beginning of the day. That is why I included the ETA that I was referring to it.
I posted that prior to the judge not allowing it.
Stop trying to imply that I am somehow ignorant or otherwise unintelligent. I'd like to think you know better, but from your commentary recently I'm not sure.
West was objecting to the court even considering the prosecution request for that (ridiculous) lesser charge, not only the actual lesser charge itself.
That's what it seemed to me your comment was relating to; it read that way. Now I see how your implication was allowing it for "jury consideration". And, I agree.
Considering the request was exactly what the judge should have done according to law; denying it was as well - IMO.
I made a comment to your comment. There was no implication that you are ignorant or otherwise unintelligent.
Know this, however, I will post as I see fit. If I have something to say about a poster seriously, I'm typically quite direct. Like this: I think you are very defensive, Jim. Since it's a drag dealing with that repeatedly, I'll see fit to keep that in mind before posting comments to your posts moving forward.