08-07-2013, 01:46 PM
This article seems positioned to cause a negative reaction and yet more cries that our civil rights are being violated.
For me, it does not. This doesn't bother me at all; it's just smart business.
We do it on a smaller scale in regards to confidential company information; I'd be troubled if governmental agencies were more lax about it.
IMO, no need to be paranoid about "insider threats", but certainly cautious and proactive. The bad guys and terrorists aren't all living in far off places (and we stand a better chance of seeing those coming). But, a Tsarnaev, Hasan, or even a Snowden (in some people's view) can wreak a lot of havoc quickly because they have much quicker access, whether it be to large groups of targets or classified information.
ARTICLE SNIP:
Watch out for "Hema."
A security training test created by a Defense Department agency warns federal workers that they should consider the hypothetical Indian-American woman a "high threat" because she frequently visits family abroad, has money troubles and "speaks openly of unhappiness with U.S. foreign policy."
That slide, from the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), is a startling demonstration of the Obama administration's obsession with leakers and other "insider threats." One goal of its broader "Insider Threat" program is to stop the next Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden from spilling classified or sensitive information.
But critics have charged that the Insider Threat program treats leakers acting in the public interest as traitors -- and may not even accomplish its goal of preventing classified leaks.
DISA's test, dubbed the "Cyber Awareness Challenge," was produced in October 2012, a month before the Obama administration finalized its Insider Threat policy. The slide about Hema is included in a section of the training about "insider threats," which are defined by an accompanying guide as "threats from people who have access to the organization's information systems and may cause loss of physical inventory, data, and other security risks."
In a statement to The Huffington Post, Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Damien Pickart said, "DISA was sensitive to any civil liberty concerns that might arise from any portion of the curriculum, which is why it coordinated with 26 federal agencies to ensure the maximum amount of input was received before going live."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/07...14333.html
For me, it does not. This doesn't bother me at all; it's just smart business.
We do it on a smaller scale in regards to confidential company information; I'd be troubled if governmental agencies were more lax about it.
IMO, no need to be paranoid about "insider threats", but certainly cautious and proactive. The bad guys and terrorists aren't all living in far off places (and we stand a better chance of seeing those coming). But, a Tsarnaev, Hasan, or even a Snowden (in some people's view) can wreak a lot of havoc quickly because they have much quicker access, whether it be to large groups of targets or classified information.
ARTICLE SNIP:
Watch out for "Hema."
A security training test created by a Defense Department agency warns federal workers that they should consider the hypothetical Indian-American woman a "high threat" because she frequently visits family abroad, has money troubles and "speaks openly of unhappiness with U.S. foreign policy."
That slide, from the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), is a startling demonstration of the Obama administration's obsession with leakers and other "insider threats." One goal of its broader "Insider Threat" program is to stop the next Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden from spilling classified or sensitive information.
But critics have charged that the Insider Threat program treats leakers acting in the public interest as traitors -- and may not even accomplish its goal of preventing classified leaks.
DISA's test, dubbed the "Cyber Awareness Challenge," was produced in October 2012, a month before the Obama administration finalized its Insider Threat policy. The slide about Hema is included in a section of the training about "insider threats," which are defined by an accompanying guide as "threats from people who have access to the organization's information systems and may cause loss of physical inventory, data, and other security risks."
In a statement to The Huffington Post, Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Damien Pickart said, "DISA was sensitive to any civil liberty concerns that might arise from any portion of the curriculum, which is why it coordinated with 26 federal agencies to ensure the maximum amount of input was received before going live."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/07...14333.html