03-14-2014, 07:49 PM
(03-14-2014, 06:00 PM)Duchess Wrote: Again, I'm saying this without knowing any details, you know how I am.
There aren't any more details available to the public than those in the OP yet. I was just curious about initial reactions based only on what we know now.
For some reason, when I read the initial story, one of the first things that crossed my mind was "why did the brother have to run and tell dad? - little effin' snitch". But, I don't really think he's to blame.
The girl is definitely partly responsible in my book too, though. She set the chain of fatal events in to motion with her lie.
I find it hard to believe that Johran wouldn't have copped to knowing the girl and being invited by her into the home when faced with a fuming father with a gun. I wonder if he did cop to it and if he got shot in spite (or because) of it.
There are only the lying daughter, the shooting dad, and possibly the snitching brother as witnesses though, AFAIK (no mention of mom being present, as of yet). If it turns out that during the course of the argument, while waiting for 911 to arrive, it became clear to shooter dad that Johran was not an intruder and there was no sign or reason to believe he had a weapon, dad should be indicted and charged despite the Castle Doctrine.