05-12-2015, 01:58 PM
(05-12-2015, 01:21 PM)Duchess Wrote:I wasn't there to hear the "tone" that the parent used to the flight attendant but the crew is charged with the responsibility and the safety of all passengers. They aren't there just to serve beverages and if special provisions for this child were needed in that regard, the parents should have made them before the flight. The fact the airline bought them tickets on another carrier showed the passengers were worthy of flying but not if they were perceived as interfering with a flight crew. If while waiting for their new departure they complained about their previous experience to the boarding agent, it's possible they would find themselves on the Bolt Bus with no services. I have seen passengers refused boarding because while they waited for their flight they went to the bar and drank too much. They were simply re-booked for the next day. My point is the child's condition, and what the parents expected as accommodations for her, collided with the post 911 flying reality the airlines face.(05-12-2015, 01:15 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: . The parents need to manage this child in the very circumstances they themselves created and stop expecting everybody else to make the adjustments.
I think you're asking too much and I don't say that rudely at all, it comes from what I observe from some parents and their kids that I see for myself when I'm out in public and read about online.
p.s. nobody likes riding the Regional Bolt Bus...
http://nypost.com/2015/05/12/bolt-bus-ca...-explodes/