05-14-2015, 10:25 AM
(05-14-2015, 09:50 AM)Duchess Wrote:
I don't think feeling guilt after the fact would matter to me. I'd be focused on the deed and making him pay for that. I have no forgiveness for those that do the kind of things that guy did. I don't tend to dwell on bs but I don't forgive & forget either.
Oh, I meant after the person was found guilty and we were deciding life or death... I'd be impartial during the first part of the trial (deciding guilt or acquittal), but once someone was found guilty I think my impartiality would be gone.
During penalty it would be about what is required of a jury by law, and the opinions of those close to the victim if provided as testimony. Testimony from the convicts side - ala Prejean - wouldn't matter much to me.
Which is probably why I'd not get impanelled
