07-07-2015, 11:59 PM
I figured you knew, Tiki.
I use "hawks" myself now and again, but only post 523 is my view/opinion.
The two posts above it are content summaries from having watched Obama's speech and read subsequent recaps/responses from media sources; here are a few:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/06/politics/o...-pentagon/
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/se...ot-working
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...minds.html
It would be great if some kind of undercover special ops could wipe out IS in the way you suggested; certainly better than sending our men and women into combat against forces that are deeply imbedded within civilian communities and spanning a few countries.
It would be even greater if the U.S. didn't need to be involved at all, IMO.
But here we are....yet again.
I use "hawks" myself now and again, but only post 523 is my view/opinion.
The two posts above it are content summaries from having watched Obama's speech and read subsequent recaps/responses from media sources; here are a few:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/06/politics/o...-pentagon/
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/se...ot-working
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...minds.html
It would be great if some kind of undercover special ops could wipe out IS in the way you suggested; certainly better than sending our men and women into combat against forces that are deeply imbedded within civilian communities and spanning a few countries.
It would be even greater if the U.S. didn't need to be involved at all, IMO.
But here we are....yet again.