10-08-2015, 01:09 PM
You didn't say that the special committee's on-going efforts weren't at least partly politically-motivated, did you?
If you are saying that, then yeah, that strikes me as naive, Slim Shady.
You mentioned the New York Times, which was first and all over the Benghazi/Clinton story for years. It even ran the false "Criminal Inquiry!" scoop.
I'm not suggesting that you should feel the same as the New York Times' editorial board does now.
I'm stating directly that if nothing new or incriminating is produced with the October 22nd testimony, I will consider it time for the special committee to stop spending tax payer money and move on. And, even The New York Times says this horse is dead.
If you are saying that, then yeah, that strikes me as naive, Slim Shady.
You mentioned the New York Times, which was first and all over the Benghazi/Clinton story for years. It even ran the false "Criminal Inquiry!" scoop.
I'm not suggesting that you should feel the same as the New York Times' editorial board does now.
I'm stating directly that if nothing new or incriminating is produced with the October 22nd testimony, I will consider it time for the special committee to stop spending tax payer money and move on. And, even The New York Times says this horse is dead.