11-06-2015, 06:39 PM
(11-06-2015, 06:00 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Man, you're delusional, Gunnar. You're not even in the ballpark at this point.Apparently odds and statistics is beyond your capacity. Is every mass murder the same as the John Holmes scenario? No. Sometimes there are no fatalities. In most cases there are no stray bullet fatalities. The John Holmes scenario is what statistical analysts call an outlier. I'm not going to belittle you for your inability to understand it, or call you slow or silly. I'm just going to simply state that you're wrong.
I've not once in this thread or any other made statements about the "evil assault rifle" or called for bans on semi-automatics.
There's no diversion in regards to "time" from me; it's just plain ignorant to suggest that time isn't a factor in trying to kill "as many people as you can" in a public mass murder. And, a valid comparison requires all factors being equal aside from the weapon, obviously.
James Holmes hit people throughout the large theater. Some of his bullets even penetrated walls and struck three people in an adjacent theater. They were much further than 21 feet from him. He couldn't have done that with a knife under the same circumstances. To keep insisting that statistics say otherwise is out of context and silly.
There's more, but you're just making shit up and spewing nonsense now so I'll leave it there.