Is this racist?

[Maggot]

It sounds like you're saying...If a group with whom you identify disagrees with the law, breaks it by destroying government property, has their day in court, is found guilty and is sentenced.........it's okay for armed protesters to illegally invade government property, and challenge law enforcement to a stand-off because it's an appropriate response to perceived overreach?

But, if government-employed law enforcement officers kill an adult or child and an unarmed group with whom you don't identify protests what they see as fatal overreach and demand their day in court, you consider that bullshit to be condemned. AND, if a subgroup of that group of protesters invades private or government owned property, they are thugs who deserve to be physically removed and incarcerated by the government because it's not an appropriate response to perceived overreach?

Am I understanding you correctly, Maggot?

I believe they will be removed the way they are going about their protest is just as wrong as the occupy movement or the BLM movement is. Standing in a road and blocking traffic is just as wrong as occupying a far out wilderness station.
You seem to be saying its OK for a government agency to despoil a river yet its OK to throw people in jail for improving their livelihood.

Adub............this has nothing to do with race and you know it.